WRIT PETITION NO.849 OF 2018
13 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "fair and remunerative price"
16 result(s) found
Found 16 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Year-Round Operation of Procurement Centres for MSP. Court holds that procurement operations are policy decisions based on seasonal harvest cycles and cannot be directed by courts under Article 226.
28 May 2025The petitioner, Rait Sena Karnataka, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Food Corporation of India for Non-Compliance of Regularisation Orders — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Took Steps Towards Compliance
19 May 2020The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by workmen unions against the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for alleged non-complian...
- 247
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
30 Apr 2020The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Quality and Rejection of Goods. The court held that where the defendant raises a triable issue, unconditional leave to defend must be granted, and the plaintiff cannot obtain a decree without trial.
13 Oct 2017The plaintiff, Shree Pushkar Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendant, Huntsman (International) India Pvt. ...
- 37
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.
30 Sep 2015The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...
