Search Results for "extrinsic evidence"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Insurance Dispute Over Voyage Monsoon Condition. Insurance Claim Repudiation Upheld as Vessel Sailed After Monsoon Set In, Breaching Special Condition Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The dispute arose from an insurance claim repudiation concerning a barge's maiden voyage from Mumbai to Kolkata. The appellant, engaged in shipping bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Documentary Evidence and Failing to Frame Proper Points for Determination Under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC.

The appellant, Kum. Harshada S., filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...