Search Results for "expunge evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "expunge evidence"

38 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in ISKCON Property and Management Dispute — Upholds High Court's Findings on Governing Body and Ownership of Properties. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their claim to the Governing Body of ISKCON Bangalore and that the properties in dispute belonged to ISKCON Mumbai, not ISKCON Bangalore.

16 May 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard a group of civil appeals arising from two suits concerning the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCO...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking FIR Registration in IIT Delhi Student Suicides — No Prima Facie Case of Caste Discrimination or Murder Found. Court Held That Mere Allegations of Caste Discrimination Without Credible Evidence Do Not Warrant Mandamus for FIR Under Section 154 CrPC, and That Police Inquiries Under Section 174 CrPC Were Sufficient.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Delhi High Court's order refusing to direct the police to register an FIR regarding the deaths of tw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Prevent Proforma Defendants from Leading Evidence in Eviction Suit — Interest Not Adverse Does Not Bar Evidence. The court held that the right to lead evidence is not dependent on the nature of interest but on the court's discretion and the necessity for just adjudication under the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882.

10 May 2024

The petition challenges an order of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai rejecting the plaintiffs' application to prevent certain defendants (Defendant No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeal in Property Title Dispute, Upholding High Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decree. The plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof to establish ownership of Schedule 'A' property under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, based on insufficient evidence including deeds and lack of lease documentation.

4 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from a title suit filed in 1986 by Smriti Debbarma on behalf of Maharani Chandratara Devi, seeking declaration of ownership ove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in POCSO Case. The court held that the case does not fall within the 'rarest of rare' category and the possibility of reformation cannot be ruled out.

3 Jun 2019

The case involves the confirmation of death sentence and appeals against conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Defendant No.4 Permitted to Amend Pleadings to Include Defence of Non-Maintainability Due to Lack of Cause of Action. Amendment Sought to Add Preliminary Objection That Suit Is Not Maintainable as No Cause of Action Arose Within Territorial Jurisdiction of the Court Under Section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by Defendant No.4 (Sahrish Constructions Private Limited) in a commercial suit (Suit No.932 of 2016) pen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Defendant No.4 Granted Leave to Amend Defence to Include Additional Grounds of Challenge to Agreement. Court holds that amendments to written statement are permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC even after commencement of trial, provided no prejudice is caused to the plaintiff, and that the test for allowing amendment is more liberal for written statements than for plaints.

6 Feb 2019

The present chamber summons was filed by Defendant No.4, Sahrish Constructions Private Limited, seeking leave to amend its written statement in a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

21 Dec 2018

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Initiating Proceedings for Fabrication of Evidence Under Section 340 CrPC — Emphasizes Need for Express Finding of Expediency. The court set aside the Sessions Court's order under Section 340 CrPC for failing to record that it was expedient in the interest of justice to probe the offence of giving false evidence under Section 193 IPC.

18 Jul 2014

The appellant, Dr. Dilip Shankar Burte, was examined as a defence witness in a Sessions Court trial where the accused was convicted and sentenced to d...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)