Search Results for "export oriented unit"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Kerala General Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Over Approval Date Interpretation. Exemption Period for 100% Export-Oriented Unit Held to Commence from Date of Unambiguous Central Government Approval (27.10.1994) Under SRO 1727/1993, Not from Production Start Date.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the interpretation of an exemption notification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The dispute inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Clarification Denying Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Benefit to Warehoused Raw Materials. Customs Authorities' Orders Declining KVSS Benefit for Imported Raw Materials Stored in Bonded Warehouse Upheld as Per Ministry Clarification.

The petitioners, ex-partners of M/s. Zuari Stainless Steel Industries, a 100% export-oriented unit, imported raw materials (steel sheets in coils) whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Application Seeking Reference of Questions of Law on Conversion of Bill of Entry. CEGAT Upheld Denial of Reconversion of Assessed Home Consumption Bill of Entry into Bond Bill of Entry Under Section 46(5) of Customs Act, 1962.

The applicant, Jain Irrigation Systems, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported a consignment of Pipe Head PHPO 40 under Customs Tariff Head 8477....