Search Results for "export incentive scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "export incentive scheme"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80HHC — Assessing Officer Cannot Restrict Deduction Below Computed Amount Once Quantum Is Determined. The court held that the deduction under Section 80HHC must be allowed as computed by the Assessing Officer, not restricted to business profits.

22 Apr 2015

The appeal was filed by V. M. Salgaocar & Brother Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in the business of export of processed iron ore, against the order of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Retrospective Withdrawal of Export Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Cancellation of Transport and Marketing Assistance Scheme Violates Legitimate Expectation and Promissory Estoppel, Unreasonable Classification Under Article 14.

5 Feb 2026

The petitioners, exporters of agricultural products, were beneficiaries of the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) Scheme introduced by the Minis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

29 Nov 2022

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Consumer Case Over Exim Policy Incentives. Exporter Not a Consumer as Government Does Not Render Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Ministry of Commerce against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Duty Exemption Withdrawal Case — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Cannot Bar Withdrawal of Exemption in Public Interest. Public Interest Overrides Individual Interest When Withdrawal of Tax Exemption Is Based on Health Hazards.

19 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard three civil appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Sikkim High Court and the Gauhati High Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

High Court

"Resolving Bureaucratic Glitches: High Court Orders MEIS Benefits for L&T Despite Systemic Challenges" "Human Discretion Prevails Over Technological Lapses in Granting Export Incentives"

13 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) regarding the grant of benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)