Search Results for "explosive substances"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "explosive substances"

99 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

25 Feb 2026

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition of Police Officer in NIA Case — Detention Held Valid Despite Procedural Challenges. Court finds no violation of Section 45 CrPC, Section 167 CrPC, or Section 309 CrPC as consent was not required, first remand by Special Judge was valid, and remand continued through cognizance and subsequent orders.

6 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Sachin Hindurao Waze, a police officer, was arrested by the NIA on 13 March 2021 in connection with three interconnected incidents: th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

18 Nov 2024

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NIA Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities — Conviction under Section 121 IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Set Aside. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt as the evidence was insufficient and the alleged confessions were inadmissible.

23 Jun 2022

The case involves an appeal by Ghayur Ahmad Jamali and Aftab Alam @ Farooq (accused Nos. 3 and 4) against their conviction and sentence by the XLIX Ad...

High Court

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Explosive Substances Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Intent to Cause Harm. The court held that mere recovery of explosives without proof of intent to cause harm does not justify denial of bail under Sections 3 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

2 Jul 2020

The petitioner, S. Chandramouli, accused No.1 in FIR No.107/2020 registered at Mandya Rural Police Station, filed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

1 Apr 2020

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Waging War Against State Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 121, 122, 124A IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of incriminating articles and recovery was not witnessed by independent persons.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.I at Gulbarga in Sessions Case No.316/2006 for offences under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)