Search Results for "expedite suit"

388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit, Directs Expeditious Trial and Continuation of Status Quo Order. Court finds that appellate court erred in refusing temporary injunction despite revenue records showing plaintiffs' possession, and directs trial court to expedite the suit.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 14.06.1986 along with a relief of injunction. During...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Maintains Interim Injunction in Property Suit, Directs Early Hearing of Suit Pending for 16 Years. Court avoids deciding appeal on merits to expedite final resolution of the suit.

The appeal arose from a suit filed in 1989 in which a temporary injunction was granted by the Bombay High Court. The injunction had been operating for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Family Suit in Matrimonial Dispute on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Pending Proceedings at Patan. Transfer of Restitution of Conjugal Rights Suit from Mahesana to Patan under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity and Hardship.

The applicant-wife filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Family Suit No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Sets Aside Order Allowing Witness Recall, Emphasizes Expeditious Resolution of 38-Year-Old Suit. Plaintiffs successfully challenge Small Causes Court decision, highlighting undue delays and insufficient justification for recalling Defendant's witness.

The petition challenges an order by the Small Causes Court in Mumbai that allowed the Defendant's witness (DW1) to be recalled for re-examination, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Status Quo Order in Property Dispute. Agreement for Sale and Possession Receipt Establish Prima Facie Case for Plaintiff, Restraining Defendant No. 7 from Transferring Suit Property.

The appeal challenges an order dated 11 October 2022 passed by the Extra Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nashik, granting temporary injunction in f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...