Search Results for "excise penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "excise penalty"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

22 Apr 2021

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of CL-2 Excise Licences for Alleged Distance Violation. Held that Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 does not apply to shops existing before the 2002 amendment and that cancellation without proper notice violates natural justice.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)