Search Results for "exception period six years"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "exception period six years"

1580 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1580 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

16 Jul 2015

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

High Court

High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Legislative Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Section 151-A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Election Commission's Notification Declared Illegal as Incoming Member's Term Would Be Less Than One Year from Date of Election Result, Violating Mandatory Proviso Clause (a).

8 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from two writ petitions challenging the Election Commission of India's Notification dated 16.03.2026 for conducting a bye-election t...

High Court

High Court Quashes Bye-Election Notification for Goa Assembly Seat Due to Insufficient Remaining Term Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Court held that bye-election cannot be held as remainder of term for newly elected member would be less than one year from date of election result, violating mandatory prohibition in Clause (a) of proviso to Section 151-A of the Act.

8 Apr 2026

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two writ petitions and a miscellaneous civil application challenging the Election Commission of India's Notifica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge by Repeat Rape Convicts Against Section 376-E IPC. Sentencing Provision for Life Imprisonment for Repeat Sexual Offenders Alleged to be Arbitrary and Lacking Procedure.

3 Jun 2019

Three writ petitions tagged together challenge the constitutional validity of Section 376-E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), inserted by the Crim...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 runs from the date the tenant gains knowledge of the cessation of the landlord's disability, not from the date of cessation itself.

18 Sep 2019

The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning the right of tenants to purchase agricultural l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Accused's Right to Default Bail in Pre-Charge Sheet Detention; Holds 60-Day Limit Applies Unless Offence Carries Minimum 10 Years' Imprisonment. Interpretation of 'imprisonment for a term not less than ten years' in Section 167(2) CrPC resolved in favor of personal liberty, entitling accused to statutory bail when charge sheet not filed within 60 days.

1 Jan 1970

The case arose from a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging orders of the Gauhati High Court rejecting bail to the petitioner. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in PC Act Case, Holds Detention Period of 60 Days Applies When Maximum Sentence is Not Explicitly at Least Ten Years. The Court Interprets 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' in Section 167(2) CrPC to Grant Default Bail When Charge Sheet Not Filed Within 60 Days.

1 Aug 2026

These Special Leave Petitions were preferred against the order of the Gauhati High Court dated 11.01.2017 rejecting the bail application of the petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim in Insurance Company Case — Employer Cannot Delay Processing of Medical Retirement Application to Defeat Dependent's Claim. The Court held that the employer cannot take advantage of its own delay in processing a medical retirement application submitted before the employee crossed the age threshold of 55 years under the Scheme for Compassionate Appointment in Public Sector General Insurance Companies.

1 Jan 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellants, who sought compassionate ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Juvenile Status Determination in Death Penalty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Delays. Applicant Failed to Prove Juvenility Under Section 9(2) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, with Discrepancies in Name and Age Documents and Belated Claim After Conviction Confirmation.

27 Mar 2023

The case involved an application under Section 9(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, filed by a convict sentenced ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)