Search Results for "evidence insufficiency"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the original complainant, Sandeep Shirodkar, against the acquittal of the accused, Shankar Dhawaskar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Whether Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Can Give Evidence by Affidavit. Court Considers Application for Quashing of Proceeding Permitting Accused's Affidavit and Rejection of Section 311 Cr.P.C. Application.

The petitioner, as complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sought quashing of the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Complainant Failed to Prove Debt or Liability. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 rebutted by accused's defence that cheque was blank and misused.

The appellant, Harendra Ramchandra Pathak, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent no.1, Rajendra Ratan Mhatre, by the Judicial Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit as Attesting Witnesses Deny Testator's Presence During Execution. Will Not Proved in Solemn Form Due to Non-Compliance with Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The dispute concerned the estate of Sahadev Deraj Shah, who died on 5th January 1998. His second wife, Shobhana, and the executors propounded a Will d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Murder and Wrongful Restraint Case, Upholding Life Imprisonment. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 341 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Was Sustained Based on Prosecution Evidence and Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts.

The appeal arose from a criminal case involving the appellant, accused No. 1, who was convicted for offences under Sections 302 and 341 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Srinidhi Finance & Investment Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Basavanthappa, for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...