Search Results for "employee provident fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employee provident fund"

647 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 647 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Educational Institutions' Challenge to Provident Fund Recovery — Upholds Applicability of EPF Act to Aided Schools and Colleges. Institutions Cannot Claim Exemption Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Once They Cease to Be Exempt Establishments.

27 Feb 2017

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by several educational institutions in Parbhani district, Maharashtra, challenging the applicabi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands EPF Case to High Court for Fresh Consideration in Light of Definition of Employee Under Section 2(f) of EPF Act. The High Court erred by relying on findings under the Industrial Disputes Act without considering the broader definition of 'employee' under the EPF Act, which includes persons employed through contractors.

14 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (EPFO) and M/s U.P. State Warehousing Corporation regarding the appl...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Employer Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Enforcement Officer. Section 7A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires quasi-judicial authority to provide opportunity to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Steel Strong Valves (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in valve manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Orders Passed Without Proper Inquiry in Textile Processing Unit Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and lack of evidence.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s Dadu Processors (P) Ltd., a textile processing unit, challenged orders dated 29.12.2022 passed under Section 7A and 06.04.2023 pas...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

20 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes EPF Assessment Order Against Employer for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Employer's Challenge to Section 7A Proceedings Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Succeeds as Show-Cause Notice Was Not Served and Order Was Passed Without Proper Inquiry.

1 Feb 2023

The petitioner, M/s. IBM India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15.07....

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Apr 2019

A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Revision Petitions in Employees' Provident Funds Act Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Employer-Employee Relationship. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove that the petitioner was the employer or responsible for compliance under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

23 Jul 2021

The case involves multiple criminal revision petitions filed by Sri D. Srinivasa Rao challenging his conviction and sentence under the Employees' Prov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Remands EPF Coverage Dispute for Pigmy Agents to Provident Fund Commissioner for Enquiry Under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the determination of whether a pigmy agent is an 'employee' under Section 2(f) requires a factual enquiry, and set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order.

7 Jul 2022

The Central Board of Trustees and other petitioners challenged an order dated 29.08.2005 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)