High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "eminent persons"
383 result(s) found
Found 383 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 747
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
11 Oct 2023The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...
- 38
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Appointment of Special Prosecutor Under SC/ST Rules for Lack of Hearing to Accused. Appointment of Advocate as Special Prosecutor under Rule 4(5) of SC/ST Rules without notice to accused violates principles of natural justice.
2 Nov 2022The petitioners, accused Nos.1 to 4 in Special C.C. No.75/2020 pending before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru, filed a wr...
- 40
High Court
- 28
High Court
- 22
High Court
- 15
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order in Wakf Property Dispute — Maintainability of Writ Petition Under Article 226 Against Wakf Board Upheld. The court held that the Wakf Board is a statutory body amenable to writ jurisdiction and the interim order of status quo was justified.
28 Mar 2014The case involves a dispute over the management and control of certain wakf properties in Karnataka. The appellant, Moulana Syed Mohammed Ibrahim, and...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...
- 73
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.
1 Jan 1970The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...
- 29
