Search Results for "electric bulb light"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Satish s/o Ramesh Nandre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 449 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Babulal Rajput, Prakash Babulal Rajput, and Harisingh Babulal Rajput, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC and Bombay Police Act Set Aside

The case pertains to the murder of Hanif @ Allabakshish Allauddin Shaikh on 07/10/2008. Nine persons were accused of offences under Sections 302, 143,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Solitary Eye Witness Testimony — FIR Not Ante-Timed, Light Source Sufficient for Identification. The court held that the testimony of a solitary eye witness, if reliable and corroborated, can sustain a conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by accused Kali Prasad Singh and Santosh Kumar Singh against their conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dinesh Sahebrao Kadam, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Latur, in Sessions Case No. 49 of 2009 for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by Dnyaneshwar Thakare, Shivkumar Yadav, Virendra Kashyap, and Narendrasingh Takkal and Rambharose Malvi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Juvenile Justice Act — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Accused Was 17 Years Old at Time of Offence and Entitled to Be Treated as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

The appellant, Vijay Ramchandra Diwar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside for Lack of Credible Witnesses and Medical Evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by three accused persons against their conviction by the trial court. The appellants, Rama Chandu Kale (accused N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Eye Witness Testimony and Dying Declaration. Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC for stabbing deceased following a dispute over loan distribution in a community meeting.

The appellant, Sanjay Jaywant Kamble, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the...