Search Results for "driver liability"

1010 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1010 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Insured in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established. Commissioner's Award Set Aside as Claimants Failed to Prove Deceased Was a 'Workman' Under Section 2(1)(n) of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by Sri Ajjegowda, the owner of a tractor and trailer, challenging the judgment and award dated 24.02.2016 passed by the Principal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can File Consumer Complaint Jointly with Assured.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing the hotel's appeal against an order of the State Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...