Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Filed by Public Trusts and Residents in Ghatkopar. The Petition Concerns Land Use and Alleged Violations Under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
30 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "drain construction"
120 result(s) found
Found 120 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...
- 1188
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies High Powered Committee Recommendations in Chardham Highway Project Case to Balance Development and Environmental Protection. The court held that widening of highways in ecologically sensitive Himalayan region must be subject to strict environmental safeguards and monitoring.
14 Dec 2021The case concerns the Chardham Mahamarg Vikas Pariyojna, a project by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to widen approximately 900 km of nat...
- 289
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.
3 Jul 2020The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Frames Points for Consideration in Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Recovery Suit in Construction Contract Dispute. Plaintiffs Claimed Excess Payment and Defective Work; Court's Final Order Not Available in Provided Text.
19 Sep 2019Background: The dispute concerned a construction contract for a residential house in Bangalore. The plaintiffs (appellants) were the owners who had en...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NGT Directions on Buffer Zones for Lakes and Rajakaluves in Bangalore — Environmental Protection Prevails Over Development Rights. The Court held that the NGT's directions for buffer zones of 75 meters around lakes and 25-50 meters around Rajakaluves are valid and must be implemented prospectively, rejecting retrospective application.
5 Mar 2019The case involves multiple appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) ...
- 1624
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal Against High Court's Directions to Allot Stalls to Unauthorized Occupiers. Held that Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 empowers removal without notice of structures erected contrary to Section 312, and the High Court erred in granting relief to writ petitioners who had no legal right to occupy public land.
1 Feb 2019The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a Bombay High Court judgment that allowed writ petitions filed by six...
- 297
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.
18 Dec 2018Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.
6 May 2011The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Housing Society Challenging Construction on Adjacent Plot — No Right to Challenge Sanctioned Plan Without Proving Specific Injury. The court held that a plaintiff must establish a specific injury or violation of a legal right beyond being a neighbour to maintain a suit challenging a sanctioned building plan.
14 Feb 2005The appellant, Kakad Co-operative Housing Society, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their Notice of Motion No.1762 of 2000 by the trial court....
- 167
