Search Results for "dog squad"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court allowed State's Appeal, Reversal of Acquittal of Four Accused in Triple Murder and Robbery Case -- Sufficient Evidence, No Procedural Lapses Acquittal set aside

The State of Karnataka appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons by the trial court in a triple murder case -- The prosecution alleged th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 328, 394 r/w 34 IPC.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for offences under Sections 328, 302, and 394 read with Section 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Life Sentence of Accused in Quadruple Murder Case Under IPC and Arms Act. Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony of Injured Survivor and Recovery of Incriminating Articles, with Death Penalty Enhancement Denied as Case Not Rarest of Rare.

The Supreme Court dealt with criminal appeals arising from a gruesome murder case where four family members were killed and one injured. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Housebreaking and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 457 and 380 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The petitioner, Thippeswamy @ Kunta Thippaga, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Challakere in C.C.No.898/2010 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 201 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellants, Jafar Khijar Sheikh and Sumit Appa @ Prakash Gawali, were convicted by the District Judge-10 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, recovery of body, and DNA evidence held sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Kumar Ganesh Rai Manto, was convicted by the Children's Court at Goa for kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, and for d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Conspiracy and Involvement of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of two individuals, Raja Mohammed (D1) and Raj Mohammed (D2), on the night of 28 December 1990 near Sarayananthal, Pap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302/149, 147, 148, 427 IPC — Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellants to Life Imprisonment. Appellants Challenged Conviction Based on Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Leading to Death.

This matter involved two criminal appeals and a bail application arising from the same judgment of the trial court. The appellants were original accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Land Dispute Case. Life imprisonment confirmed for accused Nos. 1 and 8 under Section 302 read with 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case arises from a land dispute leading to the murder of Ashok Parjane. The trial court convicted accused No. 1 Kundalik and accused No. 8 Dhansin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...