Search Results for "distinct commercial commodity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distinct commercial commodity"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Market Fees on Vanaspati as Edible Oil Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Held to Fall Within 'Edible Oils' Entry Added by 1987 Notification; Levy of Fees and Supervision Charges Upheld.

16 Jun 2006

Two writ petitions were filed by companies manufacturing Vanaspati, challenging the levy of market fees and supervision charges by the Mumbai Agricult...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Embossing and Cutting of Aluminium Foil Not 'Manufacture'. Process of embossing 'PULL' on aluminium foil and cutting to shape for cigarette packing does not result in a new product distinct from the input, hence no excise duty liability under Central Excise Act, 1944.

2 Feb 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V, filed an appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not Exigible to Tax Under Entry 82 of Schedule IV of KVAT Act, 2003. The court held that the product, being a mixture of dehydrated potato flakes and vegetables, does not fall under the specific taxing entry and is not exigible to tax.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.40521/2010 dated 10.02.2011. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Return in Summary Suit — Friendly Loan Not a Commercial Transaction Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that a suit for recovery of a friendly loan filed under Order 37 Rule 2 CPC is not a commercial suit under Section 2(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

6 Dec 2021

The respondent (original plaintiff) filed a Commercial Summary Suit under Order 37 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute — Entry C74 'Plastic Footwear' Construed as Requiring Predominant Plastic Content, Not Exclusively Plastic. The product 'Escort 111 SYN Black', though not wholly made of plastic, was held to be covered by Entry C74 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as it was predominantly made of plastic and moulded.

24 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Sales Tax appealed against the decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which had held that the product 'Escort 111 SYN Blac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of DFIA Application for Maize Starch Powder Export. Court holds that the product 'Maize Starch Powder' is not covered under SION entry E75 which specifies 'Maize Starch', and the petitioner failed to comply with the requirement of submitting proof of export within the prescribed time limit under the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in export business, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its appli...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Entry Tax Case — Lubricants Not 'Petroleum Products' Under Karnataka Entry Tax Act. Synthetic and petroleum-based lubricants imported under Customs Tariff Chapters 34 and 37 are not covered by the definition of 'petroleum products' in Section 2(6) of the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, 1979, and thus not liable to entry tax.

16 Dec 2020

The appellant, M/s. Kluber Lubrication (India) Pvt Ltd, a private limited company registered as a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Levy of Sales Tax on Cane Jaggery While Exempting Palm Jaggery Under Madras Act. Classification Upheld as Cane and Palm Jaggery Are Commercially Different and Tax Does Not Violate Article 14 or 301.

17 Jul 1969

The appellants, dealers in cane jaggery in Tamil Nadu, challenged the levy of sales tax on cane jaggery while palm jaggery remained exempt, under the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)