Search Results for "dispossession without due process"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Over Access and Possession of Suit Plot. Court finds no prima facie case for exclusive possession or title in favour of plaintiff society of flat purchasers.

The plaintiffs, a proposed co-operative society of flat purchasers in Girnar Tower, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.

The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Possessory Title Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Prior Possession or Better Title. Concurrent findings of First Appellate Court upheld that defendants had valid title and possession through registered sale deeds.

The appeal arose from a suit for declaration of title and possession filed by Moti Ram (respondent) against Poona Ram (appellant) and others. The plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Auction Purchaser Cannot Dispossess Without Due Process. Prior Possession and Forcible Dispossession Within Six Months Entitle Plaintiff to Restoration Irrespective of Title.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Mr. Kadir Ilahi Bagwan (applicant) challenging the judgment and order dated 25th July 2016 pas...