Search Results for "dishonored cheques"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to External Account Freeze. Dishonour Attributable to Police Investigation Freeze Order, Not Insufficiency of Funds Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Proceedings Unsustainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal petition filed by Petitioners and its directors seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Cheque Dishonour, Grants Conditional Leave to Defend. Court holds that in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, the defendant must show a triable issue or substantial defence to obtain unconditional leave to defend.

The Plaintiff, Tiscon Realty Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit (No. 34 of 2021) against the Defendants, C. G. Edifice (a partnership fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Appeal Dismissed as Loan Not Established as Legally Recoverable Debt Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Girdhari Parmanand Motiani, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of the respondents, Vinayak Bhagwan Khavnekar and another,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant's Widow in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Restoring Complaints Dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Held that the Magistrate erred in dismissing complaints under Section 256 CrPC without considering the death of the original complainant and the request for substitution.

The appellant, Smt. Nirmal Dewan, is the widow of Shri Trilok Dewan, who had filed three separate complaints against the respondent, Anand Shroff, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case. Cheque Drawer Alone Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Admission of Liability in Settlement Does Not Create Vicarious Liability.

The petitioners, Banwarilal L. Saini and another, were accused nos.1 and 3 in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...