Search Results for "discarded goods"

175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Bogus Purchases Case — Disallowance of 10% Purchases Set Aside. ITAT's finding that AO's order was not based on cogent evidence required full deletion of addition, not partial disallowance.

The case involves three Income Tax Appeals filed by the Assessee, Ashok Kumar Rungta, challenging the ITAT's order dated August 9, 2017, which upheld ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Exemption for Bonded Warehouse Sales Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act. Legal Issue Concerned Whether Transfer of Documents Before Filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Before Crossing Customs Frontiers.

The matter concerned two sales tax references made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arisin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity.

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...