Search Results for "dilatory tactics"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "dilatory tactics"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Substitution Despite Age Limit and Quashes Rejection Order. Substitution Permitted When Original Applicant Crosses Age Limit of 45 Years Under Government Resolution Dated 21.09.2017, as Judicial Interpretation Has Retrospective Effect and Authorities Cannot Adopt Dilatory Tactics.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by a widow and her son seeking compassionate appointment following the death of the husband/father who was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Ineligible Slum Dwellers Against Eviction Notice in Slum Rehabilitation Project. Appellants Found to Be Transit Camp Tenants Who Suppressed Earlier Proceedings and Used Dilatory Tactics to Obstruct Redevelopment Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Bombay High Court's order dated 04.01.2023, which had upheld a notice dated 06.12.2022 issued ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

22 Apr 2024

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

20 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet. Indefeasible Right Accrues on Expiry of Statutory Period and Filing of Bail Application Before Chargesheet.

13 Mar 2020

The appellant, M. Ravindran, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2018 for offences under the NDPS Act. Under Section 36A(4) of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

25 Sep 2019

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree Despite Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application — Delay Condoned Due to Pendency of Earlier Proceedings. The Court held that the statutory right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is not extinguished by the dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and time spent in bona fide proceedings for setting aside the ex-parte decree constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the defendant-appellant against the order of the Madras High Court refusing to condone the delay of 546 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher Terminated for Non-Production of Caste Validity Certificate. Termination Set Aside as No Fraud or Fabrication of Caste Certificate Was Alleged, Relying on Government Resolution Dated 07.12.1994.

13 Apr 2015

The petitioners, a educational society and its school, challenged the judgment and order dated 27.09.2013 passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati Divi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Property Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Possession. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and That Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy for Title Disputes.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by members of the Shirole family challenging a mutation entry in the revenue records of a pro...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)