Search Results for "differential treatment"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgments on Creamy Layer Determination for OBC Reservation in Civil Services. Inclusion of Salary Income for PSU Employees Under Category II(C) of Office Memorandum Dated 08.09.1993 Found Discriminatory and Set Aside Due to Violation of Article 14.

The Supreme Court dealt with three consolidated civil appeals arising from separate High Court judgments concerning the determination of creamy layer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.10,44,212/- Modified to Rs.25,00,000/- with 9% Interest. Future Loss of Income Recalculated Based on Notional Income of Rs.4,500/- per Month and 40% Disability.

The appellant, Ambala Muljibhai Makwana (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was driving a motor cycle on 18.01.2003 when a tanker bearing re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Differential treatment of pre-2000 retirees violates Article 14; MCGM directed to revise pensions equally.

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...