Search Results for "deterrent punishment"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault and Criminal Intimidation but Grants Probation to Accused. Court holds that benefit of Probation of Offenders Act can be granted even after conviction if no previous conviction is proved and circumstances warrant leniency.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by Sushil Sawant (appellant) against six accused persons (respondents 2 to 7) alleging offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence in Section 324 IPC Case — Sentence of Imprisonment Till Rising of Court and Fine Held Adequate Given Nature of Injuries and Acquittal of Co-Accused for Graver Offences.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking enhancement of sentence imposed on resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor in MSRTC Ticketless Travel Case — Reinstatement Set Aside as Punishment Not Disproportionate. The court held that the Industrial Court's revisional order restoring dismissal was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioner, Mahadeo Shripati Khot, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since December 1988. On 31...