Search Results for "deposit direction"

1712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MPID Act Deposit Dispute — High Court Erred in Treating Investment as Loan Transaction. The court held that amounts advanced with promise of interest constitute 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of MPID Act, and failure to repay amounts to 'fraudulent default' under Section 3.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellants' Criminal Revision Application under the MPID Act. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Ensuring justice through fair compensation and rectification of errors. Court Orders Appellants to Deposit Deficiency and Compensate Respondents

Pre-emption suit concerning disputed property, where the appellants seek relief due to a calculation error in their deposit. Despite attempts to recti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Endorsement Denying Compensation in Land Acquisition for National Highway — Payment Cannot Be Withheld Due to Title Dispute After Vesting. Competent Authority Must Deposit Disputed Amount Before Court Under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956, Not Refuse Payment.

The petitioner, T. Younis @ Unees, a landowner, challenged two endorsements dated 20.05.2022 and 20.09.2022 issued by the Special Land Acquisition Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...