Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Head Master's Petition for Pension and Benefits Despite Post-Retirement Disciplinary Inquiry. Disciplinary Inquiry Initiated After Superannuation Without Statutory Authority is Invalid and Pension Cannot Be Withheld.

The petitioner, Ashok Ramrao Kadam, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 9 August 1984 and later promoted as Head Master. He served until his supe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Issued on Retirement Day for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Departmental Action Initiated After Superannuation Without Pending Proceedings or Pension Disallowance Is Barred by Service Rules.

The petitioner, Narendra K. Kumbhare, was employed with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. from 24.04.1985 as a Typist and was promoted over the years, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Withholding of Pension for Misconduct in Municipal Corporation Cases. Pensionary benefits can be withheld under Pension Rules for misconduct committed during service, even after retirement, if proceedings are initiated within a reasonable time.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (now Mumbai) challenging the Commiss...