Search Results for "defacto complainant"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Defacto Complainant's Petition Seeking Summoning of Magistrate in POCSO Case Citing Absence of Signatures on Victim's Statement. Court Holds That Non-Signing of Section 164 Statement Does Not Vitiate Its Admissibility and Directs Expeditious Trial Completion.

The matter pertained to a writ petition filed by the defacto complainant, the father of a minor girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted at Vibgyor H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony. Prosecution Failed to Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC for Offences Under Sections 302, 323, 341 IPC.

The defacto complainant, father of the deceased Gopinath, filed this criminal appeal under Section 372 CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for alleged aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 6-year-old girl. The vic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Quash Petition in Rash Driving Death Case Due to Compromise with Victim's Family. Court Holds That Offences Under Sections 125(a), 125(b) IPC and Section 185 MV Act Are Private in Nature and Can Be Quashed Under Section 528 BNSS.

The petitioner, Balaji, was the sole accused in Crime No.51/2024 registered at Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Revision Order in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of 15-Day Notice Period Held Invalid, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioners, accused in a cheque dishonour case, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking to set ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...