Search Results for "deceptive similarity"

122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...