Search Results for "dacoity preparation"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 398, 324, 419 IPC. The Court Re-Appreciates Evidence to Determine Whether Trial Court Erred in Convicting Accused for Dacoity Preparation and Impersonation.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-XV, Bangalore, in S.C.No.946/2009...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dacoity Conspiracy Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Preparation. Petitioners' names were shown as absconding in FIR under Sections 399 and 402 IPC without any material to show they were part of any assembly to commit dacoity.

The petitioners, Imran Khan @ Imran Pasha and Imran Pasha, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...