Search Results for "continuous officiation"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order on Seniority and Promotions in MEPS Act Case. Seniority of teachers in aided schools must be determined based on continuous service in the cadre, not on the date of acquiring higher qualifications.

The petitioner, Chagan s/o Namdeorao Athawale, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the primary section of a school run by respondent No.2 on 1 Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre — Continuous Service Length Decides Seniority Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Education Officer's Order Upheld as Respondent No.4 Appointed Earlier, Hence Senior.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, and respondent no.4, Sunil Ananta Devkule, were both assistant teachers at New English School, Mandhardeo, run by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inter Se Seniority Dispute Among Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 — Seniority Determined by Date of Entry into Category Based on Qualifications

The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant and the 5th respondent, both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a secon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Seniority List in Zilla Parishad Service — Seniority Determined by Date of Continuous Appointment, Not Date of Initial Application

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by employees of Amravati Zilla Parishad challenging the seniority list prepared by the Parishad. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...