Search Results for "constructive possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "constructive possession"

358 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 358 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Court Fee on Market Value in Partition Suit. Valuation Must Be Decided on Plaint Allegations, Not Cross-Examination Admissions, Under Sections 35(1) and 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

17 Jul 2026

The writ petition arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiff (petitioner) against his brother and the legal heirs ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Allows Writ Petition, Setting Aside Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit. Plaintiff Entitled to Fixed Court Fee Under Section 35(2) as Joint Possession Presumed Unless Ouster Proved.

17 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, by its single judge, entertained a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent factual findings by lower courts upheld as appellants failed to establish any legal error in dismissal of suit for injunction and adverse possession claim under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

6 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from a Regular Civil Suit filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat and its officers to ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Not to Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence. The Court Held That Concurrent Findings of Fact by Trial Court and Appellate Court Cannot Be Interfered With Unless Perverse or Jurisdictional Error Exists.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were the plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision Against Summoning Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Dispute Over Partnership Firm's Authority to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 must be filed by an authorized person, and partners are not automatically liable.

16 Sep 2025

The applicants, Romell Housing LLP and Jude Romell, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the summoning order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.

29 Nov 2024

The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)