Search Results for "composite transaction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "composite transaction"

158 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 158 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

29 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Plaintiff entitled to decree for Rs.1.65 Crores with interest as defendant failed to raise a triable issue under Order XXXVII CPC.

31 Oct 2017

The plaintiff, Tradelink Exim (India) Pvt Ltd, filed a Commercial Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Supplies Under Works Contract Not Liable to Tax as Sale. The court held that the transaction for designing, engineering, supplying, erection, installation and commissioning of a project was a works contract and not a sale of goods under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

20 Dec 2017

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at the instance of M/s. B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeal on Valuation of Imported Goods Under Customs Act, 1962 — Design and Supervision Charges Not Addable to Transaction Value. The Court held that costs for post-importation activities like erection, commissioning, and performance guarantee tests are not includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 4 read with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

27 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, and Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) regarding the valuation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. The court upheld concurrent findings that the plaintiff failed to prove the agreement and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

25 Oct 2016

The appellant, Manohar Pamandas Jani, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)