Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "commercial summary suit"
345 result(s) found
Found 345 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.
17 Feb 2026The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....
- 371
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.
1 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...
- 188
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Additional Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Additional Written Statement on Payment of Costs of Rs. 10,000/-.
26 Jun 2024The petitioner, M/s. Rhea Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 08.04....
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Application to Reject Plaint in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Fixed Deposits Allegedly Misappropriated by Bank Manager. Court Holds That Dispute Arising from Breach of Contractual Terms of Fixed Deposit Constitutes a Commercial Dispute Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Despite Allegations of Fraud.
10 Jun 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application filed by the State Bank of India (defendant) under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of t...
- 601
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition in Summary Suit Leave to Defend Case — Condition of 25% Deposit Reduced to 10%. The court held that where triable issues are raised, leave to defend should ordinarily be unconditional, and a condition of deposit should only be imposed in exceptional circumstances.
2 Aug 2023The case involves a dispute between real brothers over a summary suit filed by the respondent (Akhtar Parvez Maimoon) against the petitioners (AMA Ind...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.
19 Apr 2023The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Return in Summary Suit — Friendly Loan Not a Commercial Transaction Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that a suit for recovery of a friendly loan filed under Order 37 Rule 2 CPC is not a commercial suit under Section 2(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
6 Dec 2021The respondent (original plaintiff) filed a Commercial Summary Suit under Order 37 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the petit...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Service of Writ of Summons Without Copy of Plaint Invalid in Commercial Suits Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Time for Filing Written Statement Does Not Run Until Proper Service Effected.
4 Aug 2021The judgment addresses an interim application by the defendant, Metso India Pvt Ltd, in a commercial suit filed by Atlanta Limited. The core issue was...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Restores Summary Suits Dismissed for Want of Prosecution, Imposing Costs for Non-Compliance with Directions. Non-Resident Indian Plaintiffs' Explanation of Travel Commitments Accepted as Sufficient Cause for Restoration.
3 Dec 2014The plaintiffs, Nakul Arun Jagjivan and Nayan Arun Jagjivan, filed summary suits against Ram V. Tyagrajan and another defendant, claiming recovery of ...
- 133
