Search Results for "coercive summons"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "coercive summons"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Proceedings in Property Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. The Commission Exceeded Its Powers Under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 by Intervening in a Private Property Matter with a Pending Civil Suit.

15 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from lands in village Zundal, District Gandhinagar, originally owned by Jethabhai Lallubhai Patel and devolved through inherita...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — Lack of Reasonable Belief and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Attachment orders set aside as customs authorities failed to demonstrate reasonable belief that goods were liable to confiscation and did not follow mandatory procedure under Section 110(3) requiring notice within six months.

13 Mar 2024

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and Pallav Gold, challenging provisional attachment orders passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of GST Amount Deposited Under Protest During Investigation, Quashes Summons Issued to Managing Director. Petitioner Company entitled to refund of Rs. 2.5 crore deposited under coercion during investigation under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as no show cause notice or adjudication order was passed.

5 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Innovators Facade Systems Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a refund of Rs. 2,50,00,0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.

18 Jul 2022

The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Cancellation of Bail in Murder Conviction Case Due to Subsequent Offence and Judicial Pressure. Bail revocation sought under Section 389(1) CrPC based on new FIR alleging murder and prior convictions, with court noting judicial officer's pressure from police and accused.

22 Jul 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated 23 July 2019, which declined to entertain applications for cancellation of ba...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Journalist in Multiple FIR Case Based on News Broadcasts. Court Transfers One FIR for Investigation, Stays Other Proceedings, and Emphasizes Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Criminal Process Under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 32 of the Constitution.

19 May 2020

The dispute arose from two news broadcasts by the petitioner, a journalist and editor-in-chief of Republic TV and R Bharat, on 16 April 2020 and 21 Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Breach of Consent Order in Arbitration Matter. Consent terms recorded in arbitration petition do not constitute a decree, and contempt proceedings are not maintainable for breach of a consent order unless there is willful disobedience of a specific direction.

29 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashapura Minechem Ltd., filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the respondents, Armada (Singa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 256(1) CrPC for Non-Appearance of Complainant — Magistrate Must Consider Adjournment Before Dismissing Complaint. The High Court set aside the acquittal and restored the complaint, holding that the Magistrate failed to exercise discretion judicially under Section 256(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

23 Feb 2015

The appellant, Shriman Kisanlalji Sarda Pratishthan, was the original complainant in Regular Criminal Case No.100 of 1995 filed against respondent nos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Enforcement of Foreign Awards Due to Non-Compliance with Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure to Produce Original or Certified Copies of Arbitration Agreement and Award Renders Petitions Not Maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. against Ashapura Minechem Ltd. seeking enforcement of foreign aw...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)