Search Results for "cleaner injury"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Amputation — Enhances Compensation with Future Prospects and Increased Pain & Suffering. Notional Income of Cleaner Assessed at Rs. 3,500 per Month with 40% Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Jitendrabhai Rajendrabhai Yadav, was a cleaner in an Eicher Tempo when on 05.06.2007, a collision between two tempos on the Ahmedabad-M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Truck Cleaner in Motor Accident Claim — Right Leg Amputation Below Knee. Court applies multiplier of 16 for age 35, adds 40% future prospects, and awards Rs. 50,000 for loss of marriage prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Premsing @ Pappu Mansing Bhil (Damor), was a truck cleaner aged 35 years. On 16.11.2007, while crossing the road to have his meal, he w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Truck Cleaner in Motor Accident Claim — Functional Disability Assessed at 100% Due to Amputation of Both Legs. Notional Income Fixed at Rs. 8,000 Per Month for Computing Future Loss of Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sanjaybhai Somabhai Tadvi, was a cleaner/conductor on an Eicher truck. On 02.01.2016, the truck driven rashly and negligently collided ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Injured Cleaner. Notional Income Assessed at Rs. 4,500 per Month with 40% Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raju Narayan Ghodekar, a cleaner aged 30 years, was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 18th August 2011 when the truck in which he ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Liable for Compensation Despite Insurance Exoneration. Employer failed to establish breach of policy conditions; Commissioner's award of compensation and penalty upheld under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves a first appeal filed by the employer, Balaji Constructions, challenging the judgment and order of the Commissioner appointed under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder and Robbery in Truck Incident — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. The court held that the circumstantial evidence including last seen and recovery of stolen property established guilt under Sections 302, 392, 397 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the conviction of two appellants, Palani @ Panni Wilswami Shetty (A1) and Kishor @ Kishya Raghunath Londhe (A2), by the Additiona...