Search Results for "cheque number"

615 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 615 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by the complainant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the accused-petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Money Loan Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Court's Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Lack of Proper Reappreciation of Evidence Renders First Appellate Court's Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant-defendant filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Complainant Bank Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Bidar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Girish Kulkarni, by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Court Holds That Stop Payment Instruction Does Not Absolve Drawer of Liability When Cheque Was Issued for Discharge of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Kamal Babulal Sharma, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 08/06/2001 passed by the 9th Judicial Magistrate, Fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Revision in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Notice sent by registered post to correct address is deemed served under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897, even if returned unclaimed.

The petitioner, Abdul Rehman M. Mulgand, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against his brother, Mohammad Ha...