Search Results for "cheque bounce"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act. The court confirmed that the accused's defence of a blank cheque was not credible and that the complainant had proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, C. Niranjan Yadav, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Any Debt or Liability, Leading to Confirmation of Concurrent Sentence of Six Months.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Krishna Gudi, against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Accused Due to Non-Existent Debt and Unrebutted Defence. Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Security for Loan Not Attracting Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Debt Not Legally Enforceable.

The petitioner, Sri Lalji Kesha Vaid, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Hand Loan of Rs.30 Lakhs Held Legally Enforceable Debt, Conviction Restored.

The original complainant, Smt. Sulekhabai Chowghule (since deceased, represented by her legal heir), filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Sri K.T. Krishnappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Notice. Complainant failed to establish financial capacity and valid demand notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Ghanshyam D. Katira, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Despite Vehicle Seizure Claim. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 NI Act Stands as Liability Not Extinguished by Seizure of Collateral.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shobhnaben Jayendrakumar Panchal against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Panchmahal ...