Search Results for "cash refund"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Under CGST Act Despite Previous Sanction for Overlapping Period. Second refund application for a specific month within a previously covered quarter is maintainable as the earlier sanction did not adjudicate the claim for that month.

The petitioner, Valmet Flow Control Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes GST Seizure Orders and Directs Release of Cash with Interest in Writ Petition. Seizure of INR 1 Crore Held Illegal as Cash Not Covered Under Section 67(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Due to Lack of 'Reasons to Believe' and Procedural Non-Compliance.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a proprietor registered under the GST Act, challenging two seizure orders dated 27th and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LIC's Reduction in Gratuity Fund Policy Surrender Value. LIC's decision to pay 92.5% of cash accumulation upheld as consistent with policy terms and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, trustees of the Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Employees’ Gratuity Trust Fund, had taken out a group gratuity policy ...