Search Results for "car allowance"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Contributory Negligence and Proper Application of Multiplier. Claimants' Cross Objection Dismissed as No Evidence of Negligence of Other Vehicle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased bachelor who died in a vehicular accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Held Liable Despite Driver's Lack of License. Insurer Failed to Prove Willful Breach of Policy Conditions; Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner and Driver.

The appellant, Harish Dhirajlal Bilakhiya, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor vehicl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Approve Dismissal in Gold Smuggling Case. Tribunal's Finding of Unfair Enquiry and Perverse Findings Upheld Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Air India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22nd July 2004 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Dispute Over Commission Paid to General Manager. Expenditure disallowed as excess over reasonable remuneration was not laid out wholly for business purposes under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.

This appeal arose from an income-tax assessment where the assessee, a woollen manufacturer, had appointed one V as General Manager. The terms of appoi...