Search Results for "bye-law interpretation"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SCEA Directive Excluding Retired Employees from Voter List in Salary Earner's Co-operative Bank Elections. Directive Issued Without Authority Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and Bye-laws Permitting Retired Members to Vote Must Be Respected.

The petitioners, Nashik Zilla Sarkari and Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (a salary earner's co-operative bank) and some of its retired employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act Case, Overturning High Court's Grant of First Right of Refusal. The Court Held That Section 11 of the Act Does Not Confer a First Right of Refusal and Upheld the Competitive Bidding Process for Appointing a Mine Developer-cum-Operator.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions concerning a dispute over the interpretation of Section 11 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax — Failure to Pay Property Tax Constitutes Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sandip Ganpatrao Bhadade and Sau. Sangita Vijay Choudhary, who were elected as members of the Gram Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Orders of Cooperative Authorities. Bylaws of Society Held Binding Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Shantiniketan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., a registered cooperative housing society under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...