Search Results for "blank cheque defence"

135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Complainant Bank Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Bidar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Girish Kulkarni, by the trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal Based on Perverse Findings. Statutory Presumption Under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused Despite Admission of Cheque Issuance.

The appellant, Uttam Ram, owned an apple orchard and supplied packing materials to apple growers, including respondent Devinder Singh Hudan. In Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.35,000/- on Ground of 'Account Closed' Attracts Section 138 NI Act; Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment Not Proved.

The appellant, Vithal @ Vithoba Gorakh Shinde, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...