Search Results for "ballistic"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Ballistic Report and Independent Witness. Conviction under Section 25(1-B) of Arms Act, 1959 set aside as prosecution failed to prove weapon was a firearm beyond reasonable doubt.

The applicant, Babu Fakira Koli, was convicted by the JMFC, Naliya, District Kachchh, in Criminal Case No.423 of 2013 for an offence under Section 25(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Nikhil More on the night of 17.08.2017 at Nashik. The prosecution alleged that the appellants (original accused Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as eyewitness testimony was found unreliable and uncorroborated, with long-standing enmity casting doubt on prosecution case.

The dispute arose from a murder case where the appellants were convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Narayan on Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.454 OF 2014

The appeal arises from the conviction of the Appellant, a Navy officer, for the murder of a woman with whom he was involved in a love affair. The tria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's account was inconsistent and lacked corroboration, leading to benefit of doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Pralhad Shejwal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sham Gade and sentenced to life impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violations in Gang-Related Shooting. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a right-hand man of Arun Gavli, based on eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Salim Abdul Razak Baig, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a ri...