Search Results for "bail order"

4943 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4943 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to Furnish Bail Application and Order Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Dhanaji Nivrutti Patil, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 21st July 2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Sangli, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Non-Consideration of Bail Order and Retraction of Statements Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Ganesh Maharudra Desai, challenged the detention order dated 6/8/2009 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggling of High Speed Diesel. Non-Supply of Bail Order Held Not Fatal to Detention Order as Detenu Was Aware of It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Samad Ismail Deshmukh, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Bail Order and Supply Documents Violates Right to Representation.

The petitioner, Vishal Manik Dambe, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11th May 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay, Non-Consideration of Bail Order, and Violation of Article 22(5). Detaining Authority Failed to Communicate Representation Decision and Consider Bail Order; Violated Petitioner's Constitutional Right.

The case pertained to a writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Placement of Full Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. Failure to Furnish Complete Bail Order Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vikram @ Bala Shahaji Sonavane, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18/7/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Than...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...