Search Results for "arms possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "arms possession"

286 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Procedural Lapses Petitioner Challenges Preventive Detention Based on Arms Act Offences and In-camera Statements -- Court Finds Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Violation of Article 22 Safeguards

4 Feb 2026

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging a detention order under the MPDA Act, which directed his detention for 12 months on grounds ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

27 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Public Order Impact — Mere Law and Order Issues Insufficient for Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be based on material showing a threat to public order, not merely law and order, and that eight past criminal cases and a chapter case did not establish such a threat.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Prashik @ Parshya Dilip Odhane, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded, under Section...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Insufficient Material to Connect Accused with Murder Despite Financial Disputes and Recovery of Weapon.

5 Dec 2019

The case arises from the murder of S.N. Gupta on 21.03.2006. The complainant, Kanta Devi, widow of the deceased, filed an FIR alleging that a man posi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in TADA Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 20A(1) — Prior Approval of DSP Mandatory. The Court held that recording of information under TADA without prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police vitiates the entire proceedings, and the defect is not curable.

16 Oct 2019

The appeal arose from an order of the Designated TADA Court dismissing the appellants' application for discharge on the ground of non-compliance with ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.

27 Feb 2019

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arms Licence Appeal, Quashes Cancellation Order for Lack of Speaking Reasons. The Divisional Commissioner's order dismissing the appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 was set aside for being cryptic and non-speaking, violating principles of natural justice.

12 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Ashok s/o Dayaram Patil, was aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 27.04.2016 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Nasik (respon...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Intent and Knowledge of Possession of Live Bullet. The court held that without conscious possession and intent, prosecution under Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959, is unsustainable.

10 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Tamas Sen, a 26-year-old Senior Sales Manager at Honeywell International India Private Limited, was traveling on official business fro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

21 Aug 2015

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MCOC Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Prolonged Incarceration. The court held that the chargesheet did not contain sufficient material to show the applicant's involvement in the alleged offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and other penal laws.

21 Oct 2013

The applicant, Javed Ahmed Abdul Majeed Ansari, was accused No.6 in MCOC Special Case No. 16 of 2006 pending before the Special Court under the Mahara...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)