Search Results for "amendment of pleadings"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holder's Application to Implead Auction Purchaser in Execution Proceedings — Order VI Rule 17 CPC Application Rejected as Execution is Not a 'Trial' and Amendment Would Change Nature of Suit

The petitioner, Sangli Zilla Parishad Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited, had advanced a loan to respondent no.1, Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Amendment Order in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought Changed Nature of Suit and Was Barred by Limitation. Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment cannot be allowed if it introduces a new case beyond limitation period and alters the character of the suit.

The petitioners, Fr. Ralin De Souza and Ashley Do Rosario, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26.02.2016 passed by the learned Civil Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After Trial Commenced Without Showing Due Diligence. Order VI Rule 17 CPC Proviso Bars Amendment After Trial Commences Unless Due Diligence is Shown.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Pandurang Tumsare, was the defendant in a civil suit. He filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Civil Suit — Petitioner Granted Leave to Amend Pleadings Based on Court Commissioner's Report. Amendment Sought to Incorporate Encroachment Findings from T.I.L.R. Report Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, Girish Bhor, was the original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 176 of 2008 filed by the respondent, Ambadas Perne, in the Court of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Section 34 Arbitration Petition — Delay in Filing Amendment Not Fatal as Amendment Only Clarified Existing Grounds Without Causing Prejudice.

The petitioner, Inox Leisure Limited, challenged an order dated 07/09/2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Panaji, which allowed an amendment ...