Search Results for "addressee not found"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Plus 30-Day Condonation Window Without Sufficient Cause.

The petitioner, Logic Eastern India Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Contempt Motion for Alleged Breach of Ad-Interim Order. Court Held That Respondent Had No Knowledge of the Ad-Interim Order and Therefore No Contempt Was Committed.

The appellant, Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dismissing its notice of motion under Order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Order in Coastal Zone Management Case — Upholds Finding That Structure Was Constructed Post-1991 Based on Satellite Imagery and Survey Data.

The case involves an appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing a writ petition challenging a demolition order passed by the Goa Co...