Search Results for "acquittal under Section 256 CrPC"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 256 CrPC for Non-Appearance on Two Dates. The Court Held That Absence on Two Dates Does Not Constitute Persistent Absence and Set Aside the Dismissal Order, Restoring the Complaint.

The applicant, Shineshilpi Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal complaint against Vimal Prakash Jain and the State of Maharashtra. The Metropolitan M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Murder Trial from West Bengal to Assam Due to Apprehended Bias and Mala Fide State Action. State's Attempt to Withdraw Prosecution Under Section 321 CrPC Set Aside as Arbitrary, and Trial Court's Conduct Raises Doubts on Fair Trial.

The case arises from a transfer petition filed by Afjal Ali Sha, brother of the deceased Kurban Sha, seeking transfer of the murder trial (S.T. No. 1 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Framing of Charges in Sexual Assault Case — Reiterates Limited Scope of Section 227/228 CrPC at Charge-Framing Stage

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Tarun Jit Tejpal against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Goa, which had refused to discharge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 256 CrPC for Non-Appearance of Complainant. Magistrate's Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Sufficient Cause for Absence.

The appellant, Nusli Wadia, filed a criminal complaint against respondents for offences under Sections 500, 501, 34, and 109 IPC. The Metropolitan Mag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Procedural Error. Magistrate's Order Under Section 256 CrPC Set Aside Because Complainant's Absence Was Not on Three Consecutive Dates as Recorded.

The appellant, Virendrakumar Ratanchand Banthia, was the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Despite Dismissal for Default — Magistrate Has Inherent Power to Restore Complaint Dismissed Under Section 256 CrPC

The applicant, Ramdas Bhagwan Bankar, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against respondent no.1, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Want of Prosecution — Technical Dismissal Not on Merits. The court held that dismissal under Section 256 CrPC is not a bar to appeal as it is not a decision on merits.

The applicant, Terna Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1...