Search Results for "accomplice"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unproven Demand. Sanctioning Authority's Lack of Competence and Failure to Prove Demand by Gesture Alone Lead to Acquittal Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arose from a criminal appeal against the conviction of Shankar Babarao Mukkawar, a former Executive Engineer with the Maharashtra Jivan Pradh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Affirms Conviction Upholds Justice Despite Previous Acquittals. Ensuring Justice Prevails: Court Upholds Conviction Despite Challenges, Highlights Significance of Victim Testimony

The respondents were convicted by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for an incident dating back to 1989. They were senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Lack of Proof of Demand in Corruption Case

The importance of corroborating evidence in proving offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the  Prevention of Corruption Act. Nagpur Bench, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Rape and Sexual Assault of Minor Under IPC and Goa Children's Act — Life Imprisonment Maintained for Offences Under Section 376 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by Vinesh Fal Dessai (A.1) and Manisha Naik Dessai (A.2) against their conviction and sentence by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Maroti Shivram Nilekar and Shamrao Murlidhar Thuse, under Section 376(2)(g) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Sudhakar Domaji Hazare and Prafulla @ Pravin Anandrao Sangidwar, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Moreshwar Hanskar and Sewaklal Yede, original accused nos. 1 and 3, challenging their conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ananda Tatyaba Kadam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the ...