Search Results for "acceptance of bribe"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sharad Manga Tayade, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge (ACB), Nanded in Special (ACB) Case No.7 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tukaram Parshuram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bill Collector in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhaskar Khashaba Yewle, was a Bill Collector in the office of Tahasildar Encroachment. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sitaram S/o. Baliram Fating, a retired Maintenance City Survey Officer, was convicted by the Special Court (A.C.B.), Nagpur, in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pralhad Sadashiv Badole, a retired government servant and former District Fishery Officer at Wardha, was convicted by the Special Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Pune, acquitting the respondent-accused Madhukar Dharmaji Kale of offence...