Search Results for "Vodafone"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Ketkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife Manisha under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Insurance Company Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Claims and Deductions. The court held that the assessee's method of accounting for outstanding claims and the deduction under Section 80M were correctly allowed by the Tribunal.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Assessee's payments for call center services and software maintenance not subject to TDS under Section 194J of Income Tax Act, 1961 as they do not constitute 'technical services'.

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) against the order of the Income Tax ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...