Search Results for "Videocon Industries Ltd."

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Videocon Industries Ltd."

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute, Holds Ahmedabad Courts Competent for Section 34 Petition. Mutual Consent to Shift Venue to Ahmedabad Established Seat There, Granting Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Overriding Original Clause Designating Rajasthan Courts.

13 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over jurisdiction for a Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appellant, Inox Rene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additional Licences Invalid.

13 Dec 2017

The petitioners, manufacturers of colour televisions, imported Video Tape Deck Mechanism (VTDM) and Colour Picture Tubes (CPTs) against additional lic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Alewadi Port Project to Third Party Under Maharashtra Maritime Board Policies. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Treatment and Non-Consideration of Original Proposal Contrary to Port Policies.

13 Oct 2017

The dispute concerns the development of a multipurpose port at Alewadi in Maharashtra under the state's port policies. Petitioner, a UK-based private ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.

1 Jul 2016

The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear imitation of the Plaintiff's registered designs, and the Plaintiff made out a strong prima facie case for protection.

27 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Whirlpool of India Ltd., a subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, filed a suit for design infringement against Videocon Industries Ltd. T...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Petitions for Enforcement and Setting Aside of Foreign Arbitration Award — Partial Award on Jurisdiction Upheld; Challenge under Section 34 Considered Inappropriate for Foreign Award. Enforcement of Award under Sections 44-49 Proceeded While Section 34 Petition Found Not Maintainable Against a Foreign Award Governed by English Law.

9 May 2014

The dispute arose from an agency agreement between Perma Container (UK) Line Limited (claimant), a UK company, and Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Foreign Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Seat of Arbitration Determined as London, Not India. Parties' Choice of English Law and London Arbitration Excludes Indian Courts' Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Sakuma Exports Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, entered into a contract dated 12 January 2010 with the respondent, Louis Drefus Commoditi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Section 138 NI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Complaint Maintainable at Place of Payee's Bank. Territorial jurisdiction for dishonour of cheque lies where the payee's bank is located, as presentation and dishonour occur there under Section 178(d) CrPC.

29 Aug 2011

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning territorial jurisdiction. The appellant, Cro...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)